...long post is long...
Basically, Luke-Jr, you did a terrible job explaining things and then wonder why there's a negative response.
Can still click
"Quote from <>" to view the cited posts / context
))... This summary is slightly inaccurate, as the shares will be of dynamic difficulty depending on your hashrate, and the value of each share will depend on your share-difficulty and the current block difficulty at the time the share is submitted, to avoid being hoppable during difficulty changes, and gracefully scale to ASICs as they are available...
Yes, but only slightly. My CPU mining & GPU (
nVidia) rigs are only slightly slower than ASICs. The variance can be disregarded because I deserve to be paid just as much per share. ((
this is obviously satire on my part. I really don't understand, and even if Eligius-HU is fully explained, this "dynamic difficulty" will scare me, in addition to the other concerns ))
(( edit 2)) Just noticed, luke, you quoted me out of context:
...the decision has basically already been made. This is just to justify the decision.
Yeah well it's not working. People seem to be against HU (according to the polls)
What I meant was that the votes don't seem to be justifying the change(s) after the fact (was that really the plan?)