Was not asking for your low-level code, nor for any specific reference implementation in any language whatsoever... The technical details could be in a high level language, pseudocode, or even a list of goals and logical assertions about how various system states and cases will interact, and what the intended result will be.

The implication which you just made: "things are going to be changed" (details that still need worked out) between now and the final implementation is the main reason I am against the Eligius-Hu change. I am of the opinion that a system which is not clearly defined or explained... No. Just no.

((edit retracted))