Yeah, they get the exact same thing when they don't participate in a pool but in any remote NIS. And since letting people harvest on a node doesnt take much CPU load, I believe this will be pretty decentralized.
You forgot about Sybil attack. People will connect to different NIS controlled by a single entity.
Actually I am not sure what you are talking about. Are you talking about NXT here? You should try out and prove what you are talking about instead of postulating about NEM. If you are trying to find out answers on how NEM manages it then I think you are barking up the wrong tree in this forum. What you are saying is implicit to a fud. Why are you paying particular attention to NEM only when we are launched now?
I don't know much about you as I don't follow much about NXT and your history. From what I see, you have done some coding (or at least your group of programmers have), but to make statements like what you have done is pretty much demeaning upon yourself. I hope that is not what you are trying to say about yourself. If you care to know more about NEM, it is not as simple as you think NEM is. For your information, like inverting a hash digest, sybil attack is a theoretical possibility. But like inverting a hash digest, sybil attack is somewhat nearer physical impossibility than a mere possibility.
Like the $42.5K you said as something that is doable but you don't have the money, this time, you don't need to spend more money to prove that your theory works. I am sure the NEM community will be very happy if you can stage a sybil attack on a constructive basis so that we can rectify the problem, take some NEM out and help you finance some of the 42.5K. Then when you earn some money, we can make back from the 3 times and put us back to even keels.
I believe it is more constructive this way than making short trolling statements and fill up the space here. I am sorry, but it is making me feel that you are now infamous for what you were.