Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on April 08, 2015, 04:31:23 PM

Quote from: gimre on April 08, 2015, 04:20:18 PM

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on April 08, 2015, 04:12:37 PM

Quote from: gimre on April 08, 2015, 04:07:43 PM

not the ones behind NAT, I guess that's pretty much obvious for you.

This is why I'm asked -> "shut down pretty much all dem nemnodes lol"

well, that came from CfA, so I'm surprised why you're even referring to that Wink

This is a standard trick when you ask a fudder for details. If he admits that the problem is not that serious as he posted - you win. If he keeps sticking to exact wording then you explain why all* nodes can't be shut down physically - you win.

----------
* - assuming that port mapping and the like is not used.

->

Quote from: From Above on April 07, 2015, 06:33:02 PM

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on April 07, 2015, 06:28:04 PM

Quote from: From Above on April 07, 2015, 06:17:38 PM

shut down pretty much all dem nemnodes lol

How is it possible if some nodes are behind NAT?

well them nodes behind nat couldnt be shut down ofc.
but my node shut down completely and couldnt reconnect to network for some time ... :0
i thought my fault but now i knew better

'pretty much all nodes' doesnt equal to 'all nodez'
+ i also said 'well them nodes behind nat couldnt be shut down ofc.'
maybe my english sux

eh? Kiss

P.S it wasnt fud !