Dr. Salby seems to be a source of highest terror to the climate science establishment/cult, and his presentations demonstrate why. This one is somewhat less dense in math (no Lagrange integrals, fewer non-time-domain plots, etc.) I find it fairly convincing because of the inherent simplicity of his logic chains.
Isn't Salby the professor who claims that there is no such thing as a greenhouse effect, and who has been fired for fraud or similar violations a few times (misusing grant money to enrich himself, etc.)?
Just generally, the hypothesis that temperature drives CO2 rather than the other way around has better explanatory power, and makes more intuitive sense to me as well.
So, do we believe you or thousands of scientists and thousands of scientific papers? Isn't it a bit more relevant what makes sense to people who are actual experts?