The science is settled insofar as there is a clear consensus on the warming and its cause, as well as its negative effects.
Hello, Lysenko.
What are you talking about?
Are you saying that you don't even know what "scientific consensus" actually means?
Tell you what. Figure out Lysenko.
As for consensus, I've worked in science and have advanced degrees, as do a lot of the people here. But we tend not to brag about them or talk down to people.
But you see, you do not have a valid argument in "consensus." Not after the various cases of fraud that have came up. Not after the hockey stick debacle. Not after the email releases. And not after twenty years of no warming.
But yeah, for kicks and grins, figure out if Lysenko should be emulated - or disgraced.