Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [ANN] Sfards: SF3301 Specifications Revealed [Updated 14/4/15]
by
padrino
on 15/04/2015, 01:44:35 UTC
Quote from: dogie on April 14, 2015, 09:21:52 PM
Quote from: Spondoolies-Tech on April 14, 2015, 03:15:55 PM
Quote from: dogie on April 14, 2015, 03:12:18 PM
Quote from: klondike_bar on April 14, 2015, 01:15:44 PM
Quote from: valkir on April 14, 2015, 12:00:19 PM
If the j/gh ratio is real, this is gonna be a game changer!  Grin

it wont be. guarenteed thats at the lowest voltage/frequency, and probably for just the chip (doesnt include regulator loss, PSU loss, other power draws like a controller/fan)

realisticlaly in a final product, this would probably range 0.28W-0.50W depending on settings (ie: similar to the Bitmain chip)

Agreed, looks extremely similar power consumption to the S5's chip on sha256 mode. The scrypt mode looks more appealing, and we don't yet know what we'll be able to do in dual mining modes. If its anything like the gen 1 chips then I don't think many people will dual mine.
Dogie, I think it's high time you'll put a disclaimer about your BitmainTech affiliation somewhere in your signature or personal text.

I only speak on behalf of those companies within their own threads, am I not allowed to hold an opinion any more?

Anyway, the lowest tested efficiency is extremely close to that of the BM1384 and BE300 tests. And as others have already said, the lowest efficiency point is not going to be the shipping stock efficiency. Hence people should remain realistic in their expectations. Do you disagree?

I think the point is that you represent yourself as a community member much like others, provide guides for numerous manufacturers, implying impartiality, but are also paid by Bitmain, a walking (or typing) set of contradictions...