This is not quite true.

An "egalitarian" society doesn't mean that everyone has exactly the same amount of everything in a purely materialistic sense, otherwise we'd have to throw out diversity as well. Do you really want a society in which everyone is a clone of everyone else ?

Lets say the entire world dollar supply is $20 and me and you both start off with $10 each. But you've a guitar that you don't want and I would like one. You sell me your guitar for $5.

Now you've got $15 and I've got $5. Immediately the money supply has become unequally distributed.

Thats why I think that most of these arguments about distribution of crypto are complete baloney. Ok - POW is a reasonable way of getting the money "out there" initially, but markets just blow that distribution to kingdom come eventually.

As far as holdings go, there only are 2 relevant entities: You and Everyone else.

Lets look at things from a global perspective for a moment. There are 7.3 BILLION people in the world. All of cryptocurrency has been effectively "instamined" into the hands of maybe a few thousand of them - lets say 10,000 for arguments sake.

That means the ENTIRE cryptocurrency coin supply is in the hands of just over a MILLIONTH of the world population. Do you really think they could care less about the ethics of distribution WITHIN that millionth ?