My current rating: scam 2.0
Interesting rating, as most of our investors have reputations they would not want to risk by associating themselves to a scam. If you look at our team, angels and advisors (
http://www.neucoin.org/en/wiki/#people), none of them are anonymous, and most of them (including myself) would risk a lot by association their names to a scam. We all have track records that are publicly available (Twitter, LinkedIn, etc).
Besides, we are all subject to very strict 5-year re-sale restrictions on our NeuCoin holdings. They were announced on our launch, on this link
http://www.neucoin.org/en/wiki/#advantages, point 10. We will only benefit from having founded NeuCoin by making the currency strive in the long run - and these restrictions insure this. Long-term success is what a cryptocurrency investor should look for, no?
They would not want to risk their reputation? Well, I guess you haven't read through this thread then:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=620267.0And regarding "track records" - do you really think that people here in the forum are so naive to think that stuff written on Twitter, LinkedIn and alike give any credibility?
No, sorry, especially that someone like Brook Pierce doesn't resign from the Bitcoin Foundation's board immedeately once he helps to set up a new coin tells a lot. He gives a shit about Bitcoin or the community. All he cares about is his personal wealth.
And let's look at your sooooo strict "re-sale restrictions":
In contrast to virtually all previous digital currencies with pre-mines, all NeuCoins held by the founding team, seed and angel investors are subject to strict re-sale provisions for five years, so that holders may only sell 2% of their holdings per month in the first year, 3% per month in year two, 4% per month in the year three, 5% per month in year four and 6% per month in year 5.
This makes 24% of the holdings in the first year.
27 % in the second year.
23 % in the third.
And so on.
Beside this: Where and how are these restrictions legally and irrevocably written down?