I've only ever got bitched at on Bitcointalk when I was really out of line, but the other day I had a fuck ton of my post all around this side of Bitcointalk removed by this asshat..
I posted 1 post in regards to a new service that accepted CLAM & one follow up that the CLAM withdraw worked.
I think I only saw one of your posts that was removed, but it was a referral link to a Ponzi scam.
There's a subforum for Ponzis and this isn't it so the mod's actions seem justified to me. The forum policy seems to be that if you want to promote scams, you do it in the scam subforum.
I don't really see where you're coming from with this. A scam is a scam even if it accepts CLAM - that doesn't make it any less of a scam. Note that they've recently stopped their "100% guaranteed" payouts, too - just in case you needed any further proof that it's just another incarnation of the old double-your-bitcoin scam.
If the whole thing is based on freedom of speech then the community deserves to at least know and be informed. It's a positive thing CLAM is being picked up even if in negative ways.
Sorry if you don't feel that way, but it is as simple as that.
There was no reason for anything to be removed off the Bitcointalk as a whole. Edit the ref off it.... maybe, but shit that is how I get a piece of the pie for doing what CreativeCLAM asked me to do. She had asked me to post new services accepting CLAMS... So that is what I did.... I don't need to worry about my post being censored over BS that frankly could help or hurt the community depending on how it is used.
Common story I think of is that Salty bought his first BTC off Pirate.... How would of Bitcoin have turned out if Pirates Ponzi post had been removed first off? How about Mtgox or Shreen ect ect ect!
I just wanted to be fair and give them their moment to prove themselves.