2: Fully on the topic of CLAMS. This is obvious.
Discussion if certain services are legit or not isn't on-topic expecially when the discussion relates to a post that has already been deleted.
4: There are no ref codes or clickable links (except the youtube link) in the post above

Your first post was deleted for ref spam.
24. If you think that post is a advertisement then LOL. More reason for you to get shit canned.
From the administrator BadBear's thread (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=718124.0), stickied in the Announcements (Altcoins) board:
Advertising spam is not allowed, this includes mining pools, gambling services, exchanges, shops, etc. Mining pool ops should make a thread within the Mining section of Alt Currencies. Most OP's already link to pools available so advertising your pool is unnecessary and leads to too much spam. Exchanges, shops, gambling sites, etc, should make a thread in the Marketplace section of Alt Currencies.
I don't make the policies, buddy, and what I think really differs from how I moderate. I follow the rules, you don't and feel that you are supposed to reign free because you don't like the regulations put in place in a
privately owned forum.
Also, thanks for force editing my post to not be self modded so you could voice your opinion.
I didn't. I don't think anyone except for administrators have the ability to remove self-moderation. Just that all Meta threads are non-self-moderated so your thread got converted when I moved it to the appropriate location.
Officer Mprep...
I'm more of a janitor than anything else.
Bitcoin is about freedom...
And Bitcointalk.org is about anything theymos has chosen. So far he has given freedom to constructiveness and a ban hammer to spam and he does not like people breaking the rules and advertising services where they don't belong.
I'd rather have the NSA praying over my posts...
I bet they already are.
...than some scrub who is so over worked they can't tell the difference between spam and a conversation.
You mean yourself?
