A lot of the evidence is compelling.
What would have been their motive?
This is crazy talk. I reviewed several of the source documents linked to and found nothing. Just routine police work.
As the source material does not support the narrative, I conclude it is a fabricated narrative. Now why would you willingly go along with propagating untruths?
I had started a thread on 911 and saw this thread which links to some material a lot of people believe. The fact that the poster and the link use the phrase "did 911", as I did, means they are probably also new yorkers.
Could you give some examples of "the source material [that] does not support the narrative"? Some of the material has been widely reported in the alternative media and is well documented. Are you saying that the poster added some trash?