The point that he is saying is you mark every other Ponzi, Scammer ect. but you did not mark this one as a Ponzi knowing it was a ponzi again (how can you not when it was copied off of cryptobdouble) but yet you escrowed for it.

Again Puzzled about this
How about you give a clear answer to this instead of insisting what you did was Heavenly.

you know you can admit being wrong about things once in a while.
Its easy to see what I am saying.

who cares what he is saying about the other crap cant understand it.

but what I am asking is just plain weird no?

Edit:

I say this part "While there are allegations that CryptoSplit is a ponzi/hyip/scam, the purpose of offering escrow services is intended to prevent signature campaign participants from getting scammed and should in no way be construed as an endorsement of the site." makes sense now why you escrowed for them.