You sent me a PM to send .85 BTC to an address which you did not enroll with, which I am obviously not going to do and as a result your PM was ignored.
Haha, classic greed - somehow users manage to convince themselves that they deserve the whole pot just because the campaign went bust.
At second, i don't accept a prorated payment, because i joined this (scam) signature campaign for a fixed payment! And it was clear for you that this turn into a scam (in the middle of the payment period). (Also it was clear for me, but this counts not now.)
I believe Mr. Quickseller try to get the maximum profit for himself, by paying less to the others...
Oh the irony, trying to claim the remaining escrowed funds for yourself when you don't actually fairly deserve them isn't the getting the 'maximum profit' for yourself? Please, at least have some common sense.
You know what you talking?
Quickseller has offered me a prorated payment of 0.0085 BTC
I only put the comma on a new place. It is your view and a coincidence that this is the whole (remaining) pot.
And further.
Where is the common sense? Who has to offer it? I or the escrow?
Who fairly deserve the remaining escrowed funds in your opinion?
Surly not i. But hey, it is not fairly if someone try to pay others with robbed money. Especially if he know or find out that it was stolen...
And then he try to make deals to pay less of the stolen money!
Please think about your comment and think about who you try to protect with your comment.
Thanks.