When individuals make laws, the underlying motive, almost always hidden, is to copy nature.
Heterarchy was first employed in a modern context by McCulloch (1945). He examined alternative cognitive structure(s), the collective organization of which he termed heterarchy. He demonstrated that the human brain, while reasonably orderly, was not organized hierarchically. This understanding revolutionized the neural study of the brain and solved major problems in the fields of artificial intelligence and computer design. To date, it has had little impact on the study of society.
Disturbance of the Proper Order
1. Whoever, with intent to provoke a breach of heterarchy, or under circumstances such that a breach of heterarchy may be occasioned, both crowds or congregates with others in or upon a street or highway, or upon a sidewalk, or any other place or building and fails or refuses to disperse and move on when ordered so to do by any end user of this title, or any other being thus authorized by the Emperor, is guilty of one disturbance of the proper order per unprosecuted instance of such failure, refusal, or both under this title.
The problem here is that the Crumley quote states the human brain is "not ordered hierarchically". This dogma doesn't fetch. It's like the chicken/egg or fate/free will argument. You can't just 'win' such arguments by saying "therefore I win".
Some aspects of the brain, of thought etc are hierarchical, some are not.
It would be reasonable to just put the last quote about 'summary offenses' in plain language rather than compounding the unarguable offence of 'sowing confusion'.