Re: Quickseller/ACCTSeller abusing trust system (here we go again!)
Alright, here's my 2 cents. 2 cents is not a lot, so I will keep it short.
1) I think you abused the coinchat x years ago
2) I think it's weird for Quickseller to add a new negative feedback after such a long time
Personally I think it is unwarranted to put a new negative feedback for something that transpired long ago. Just like it is strange to post again in a long dead scam accusation thread.
1) I think you abused the coinchat x years ago
2) I think it's weird for Quickseller to add a new negative feedback after such a long time
Personally I think it is unwarranted to put a new negative feedback for something that transpired long ago. Just like it is strange to post again in a long dead scam accusation thread.
It may be weird but IMHO there is valid point for adding a negative trust though I don't know what's Quickseller's intention.
- 2.5 years ago TF was in default trust list.
- tspacepilot earned Bitcoins from coinchat using bots.
- TF added a negative trust feedback and was in trusted feedback.
- TF was removed and the feedback went to untrusted feedback.
- Quickseller bumped it because that is a scammy behaviour.
- Hence, everybody can see his scammy behaviour.
Leaving negative feedback for things happened long ago isn't unwarranted/unjustified.
Maybe unwarranted wasn't the right word to use... It just seems petty to me, that's all. Yeah, I do think from reading about the old issue that tspacepilot abused coinchat. I also think he's been around since then without any issues.... I don't see him running off and pulling a scam in the near future. I'm not putting a negative feedback on your account because of that cookie you stole from the jar when you were a kid either, am I? That would be petty. Especially if it would cause you to get kicked out of that precious signature campaign
Again, it's just my opinion.