eightcylinders thanks for that. its very illuminating and has made me re-evaluate few things i can take more distance and look at some of the correspondence with lawyers more neutrally. it looked like some of the lawyer(s) had an emotional component in all of this but in actuality it was just talk to retain the customer (maybe not in good taste. but oh well even the guilty need lawyers and im sure he would have chosen someone more... lets say amicable). Mr. Garbazzo had many different law firms during the fraud so he could control the message exactly like he wanted to any one entity


ps:
i fully agree with Paul its integral in the grand scheme of things. currently Mr. Garbozo + co are staking at 100%. this thing is an ongoing fraud still. if you cant take posts that are spit-balling ideas maybe this is not the place for you, or you can check page 1 for updated details as they are confirmed. it would be a very dry and boring thread if there was no commentary/analysis along the way

about the current fork thats in place: Garza tried to battle it saying his lawyers will handle it. now he is all on board? something changed. is he trying to gain control again...
the fact that miavitor and jmordica are on board with decreasing or even removing PC's leave only few options left. who the hell is currently against it (if any except GAW)? was this only a starting salvo to start phasing out Mr. Garbanzo. who are the controlling parties in GAW's portion of PC's... eg. is Stu activating legal means to gain some control

or is it all talk by current "ruling party" to try and keep price stable enough to unload more on "the muggles"