Can you provide an example where
1) someone was suspected of scamming
2) they provided information to show they were legit
3) the negative feedback did not get removed and
4) the person that left the negative feedback is (still) in the Default Trust list?
Yes, I can.
1) I was never suspected of scamming.
2) My over 3 years of honestly trading here demonstrates I am legit. I was accused of "lying" on the basis of a topic which is under debate and neither party can prove the validity of the accusation. (additionally "lying" has never been an acceptable use of giving negatives from someone on the default trust.)
3) The negative feedback did not get removed.
4) The person who left the feedback is still on the default trust list.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.0;all1) True.
2.a) You lied saying staffs protect Vod even after SaltySpitoon explained.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg10062871#msg100628712.b) Lying is a quality of an untrustworthy person. Trust system is not only for trades and that's why it is
trust feedback not
trade feedback.
3) It was changed to neutral feedback and you continued what you did earlier and it was reverted.
4) True.
TBH, I think this anti-trust_system behaviour of yours came after you were removed from default trust list. You are trustworthy enough for me except your judgements.