Re: [ANN] [TRON] Positron --- Real World Crypto Startup - Anon Beta Test Now
In the OP didn't the dev say that Prom fucked him over in the past and this was a chance to get it right? So why is he working with him again?
Just because prom holds the coins, doesn't mean he's working with the dev right?
Cryptowest made a great move to build confidence in himself and his project, but Prometheus's stupid tweet about that giant wall fucked it all up. Everything even mildly associated with Prometheus turns to shit, and while it's pretty damn obvious to the rest of us, he'll never accept blame for anything (unless it's successful, then he'll take full credit).
Maybe Prometheus is on the outside looking in and acting like a dick as usual, but it seems more likely that he's still on the inside getting his jollies from "controlling" the market, no matter how badly he ruins it for others. Prometheus has nothing at stake right now while Cryptowest put his identity on the line...if Prometheus is a legitimate member of the team, maybe they should post his dox too. I'm sure that's not going to happen though, so get him on a leash and keep him out of sight, for all of our sake.
I've done nothing but support this project, but behavior like that makes me sick.
I reckon if the top 20 holders form a pact - a collective refusal to supply the market below a certain price we all agree on - we can greatly nullify anyone who is trying to kill the coin (god knows why, he would make far more trickle selling and allowing the market to rise at it clearly wants to).
No identity's need be disclosed - just have the relevant wallet in the top 20 send a specific amount of TRON say 0.1337 to a certain publicly viewable address upon agreement to the terms (whatever we come up with and find amicable).
We are pretty weak on our own - even 2% isn't very many coins in reality - but if we get say 25% of all TRON off the market until at least XXX,XXX satoshi then we can turn this back in our favor.
Goodness gracious, the level of naivety in crypto is simply gobsmacking! I'm as keen as the next person to see the price rise and not be severely affected by negative people trying to do damage but what you're suggesting is collusion plain and simple! It's the false manipulation of a market. In most jurisdictions around the world it's a criminal offence for participants in a market of any sort to band to together to control the price. People are charged, found guilty in courts of law and sent to prison every year for this sort of market-rigging crime.
I understand where you're coming from and what you're trying to achieve to protect Positron from adversity, but to organise (so specifically and systematically) a process where larger coin holders are in cahoots with each other to minimise coins for sale or behave in a certain agreed-amongst-themselves way to effect an out come....sorry, but it's the very epitome of what open and fair markets are trying to route out!
(Furthermore, the temptation for one of the larger holders to break with the pack and dump before anyone else gets a chance will be just all too strong....a plan based on manipulative behaviour and collusion is almost always going to fail because the natural tendency towards an intent to mislead creates a "there's no honour amongst thieves" mindset that's doomed to misappropriation).