You need to first recognize that God exists. Then, maybe you can start to think about finding the info and understanding about Himself that He provides for people.
Since you don't even want to accept that God exists, how can you even fathom the idea that He speaks to people through the Bible? That's why you mistakenly think that there is fallacy in what I understand about God.
Since you don't even want to accept that God exists, how can you even fathom the idea that He speaks to people through the Bible? That's why you mistakenly think that there is fallacy in what I understand about God.
I am more than willing to accept any new data which can serve to warrant changing a previously-held position, that's what the scientific process is all about and one of the typically-dishonest thing theists like to claim is evidence of how science can't possibly be right because, you know, it keeps 'changing its mind'.
Whereas what you 'know' about your god, personally, is what you 'know'. Not what can reasonably be asserted, mind, just the absolutely certainty that you are right because . . .you 'know' . . .!
That's not sufficient and is actually a highly dangerous method for defining your reality, to simply believe something by way of subjective experience. Ever read about people who jump off high buildings because they believe they can fly? Do you have any idea how convinced somebody has to be to commit to that leap?
Prior to jumping, they would not be able to objectively prove that they had good reason to believe they can fly, but they sure as hell 'know' they can fly as they jump.
Except, of course, they can't.
The exact same thought process you are so desperate to cling to is the one which convinces people they can fly.
As long as you maintain science as your main god, you are going to have a hard time in understanding the real God.
