Hi Vod; remember how this conversation started?
Stevenson's study is
completely reproducible which means that anybody who doubts the validity of this study is perfectly welcome to repeat it for themselves.
http://www.near-death.com/evidence.html#a39Did I give you what you wanted?Every credible doctor in the world will tell you what causes an NDE. You can have an NDE simply being sedated for surgery.
Is that your proof? Brain cells being robbed of fuel and misfiring? There's no god needed for that.
How do you know there is nothing else needed for an NDE besides the "products of a brain and the universe of which it is a part"?
The skeptical "dying brain" theory of NDEs has major flaws. The proper approach would be to pursue the research as originally proposed and compare the hypotheses in light of the data.
Kindly review the reference if you want to cointinue on this topic:
http://www.near-death.com/evidence.html#a34