Not really sure what difference it makes as ideas stand on their own merit but I could see a possible suspicion of bias.
For what it matters I am long both GIGAMINING and BITBOND (a comparably sized mining bond with 210Ghs issued) and am probably one of GIGAMINING's top 5 investors and therefore I have more of a financial interest in positive movement of GIGAMINING's price than Gigavps.
Aside from a private contract which would be difficult to execute quietly, and I am unaware of any that exist, therefore I think it is safe to assume that the only person who could have a material financial interest in a short position on GIGAMINING is Gigavps.
It really makes no sense for the short to call the long a short and is a complete distraction from the material issues.
Hi sunnankar,
Please go back a re-read what I said. I was referring to you trying to
pump the price of
BITBOND in my thread. I have no worries about Gigamining's price.
Thank you Gigavps for professionally answering the first question regarding income capacity.
You are welcome.
Is there any particular reason you are being so evasive on the second question related to liquidity and how many bitcoins you have in your personal possession that can meet GIGAMINING debt service? How long is this nebulous 'foreseeable future'?
I will not divulge my bitcoin holding publicly. I will be traveling for the rest of the week, but when I am back I will have Patrick run an assessment of Gigamining and will pay him for his time. He can then issue one of his credit ratings for Gigamining and we will be done with this.
Best,
gigavps