You guys really didn't like that cryptsy news, huh? Lord that was a lot of posts.

Still not sure why that shocks anyone, but whatever. If that's the straw that breaks the camel's back for you and cryptsy good for you, get out while you can, but everyone needs to calm down over the "reputation" stuff. Gox, BFL, GAW, Vircurex, and all the other scams/ripoffs in the lending/securities/mining had no to shit reputations and that didn't' stop tons of idiots from pissing away their money, not sure why people think THIS particular instance of shenanigans is going to ruin cryptsy, but whatever.

If any journalist crusader types really want to get somewhere they should push the 9/11 hashlet scam angle to Cantor. Cantor lost over 600 people that day, they have set up a serious fund that actually does stuff for 9/11 victims. Someone in that company connected to something that even smells of fraud would be bad pr for them, actual fraud would be very bad for them. I don't think that they would be happy with a company Fraser is connected with donating money to that shit charity that they did donate to instead of one of their real ones, even if all the money went there, the fact that not all the money went there could cause them to act.