I don't get this. A instamine is not a premine. The devs did not preemptively take a large number of coins out of circulation. I wonder if money changed hands here to get us listed as such. Shame on coinmarketcap, shame on the Monero shills/devs.
I have to say I did not tell them it was a premine. I told them it was an instamine (and even that was only extra supporting information such as quotes from Evan after someone else had already posted about the instamine itself). You can find my post on their thread (it was linked here). That's the only communication I've had with them at all. Personally I think they should change the tag to "significantly premined or instamined" (and I said that too on their thread) but that is just my opinion. What they do is up to them.
You quoted threads posted by people that obviously had a beef with Darkcoin, your Darkcoin hate thread included.
Trying to say optimised miners were created is one thing. Monero miners were being
overwhelmed by optimised miners at one end, and code baked in to rig the game at the other end.
Following a predefined trajectory yes, but with one or two people skimming most of the coins of that trajectory.
That's just another definition for instamined. If you had participated in the deoptimization I would have called you a scammer. You seem to have been the victim of the scam, along with everyone else, so I'll leave it as instamined for several months.
You need to submit that to coinmarketcap and to request Monero be flagged as instamined by a possible rouge dev.