From the discussion about the anonymously posted Prime Controller keys it seems that when transferring a PC from one person to another there is nothing keeping the original owner from using the same key afterwards. Is this correct? Also, is it possible for the first owner to access the coins in the new address after a transfer? I am specifically wondering if this is the proof that the whole mutiny story and theft of Paycoins/Prime Controllers from Homero is bullshit.
As far as I understand, keeping a copy of a key is possible, it's actually nearly impossible to ensure that a copy is not kept. But no, it does not give access to coins. The coins would have be transferred via a regular blockchain transaction.
Hmmm. Somewhere here is the proof that the theft/hack of coins and Prime Controllers from Homero is all a bullshit misdirection/ washing the scam of Homero Stank scheme.
I mean, at minimum Homero could have simply made new Prime Controllers to replace those that were "stolen", and then simply say that the others were stolen and his are legit. I know that most or all of the mutiny story is bullshit and that the whole shitshow is still controlled directly or indirectly by the same scamdog that has been running it all along. I thought at some point it was announced by one of the "Not Josh" gangs that the ~4,600,000 XPY address that appeared after the hack belonged to them, is that true? If so, that might be the path to proof.
This is a guy that keeps shadow banning himself on a simple forum server...