That is another example of the fallacies being used to defend sha in bitcoin.
I'm not defending SHA. Why do you get that impression?
Is it not enough that I do not want to use an algorithm that was developed for and promoted by an intelligence gathering agency that for decades has used its data mainly for overseas repression?
This is an ad hominem fallacy.
I am not a cryptographer.
Then you will have a hard time convincing cryptographers about what you believe is right. You should consider researching what you defend.
I do not trust an algorithm developed by the nsa.
Why so many people are so quick to use weak arguments to defend the use of an nsa algorithm in bitcoin, I don't know.