Gliss should be impartial, and that means seperating the coins based on what actually happened and in this case, Dash had a premine or at the very least, **Significantly Fastmined**. You've mentioned Monero, but Monero has never had any of it's core parameters changed so Dash and Monero cannot be compared in the slightest.
You are correct. Dash and Monero cannot be compared in the slightest. Dash, as a fork of Litecoin at the time, suffered some issues that were related to the Litecoin code by a programmer new to the code base. It took a day or two to diagnose and fix and much longer to get a working explorer to figure out that so many blocks were created before the difficulty adjusted. There is no proof about the intentions of the developer. Monero on the other hand had code intentionally inserted with
no other purpose than to make the built in miner inefficient at launch so that the developer could take advantage.
Monero is the only coin being discussed here that was
provably and intentionally manipulated by the developer to give themselves an advantage.
Personally, I think this is a very slippery slope. If we start trying to define new categories like "launch issues", "fast-mined" (which most PoS coins would fall into), "insta-mined", or other categories like "dishonest developer" - all categories with very subjective definitions - you'll end up in a slug-fest between competing coins trying to get their competition labeled. Thank you coinmarketcap for deciding to stay above the fray.
So much this...
Here the important word is : INTENTIONALLY, which make no doubt about Monero SCAM. Something
was made to give benefice of few over the others.
You got it... while other people are denying:
There was nothing wrong with the history of Monero. It's one of if not the cleanest coins and launches in history.
Just lol..