Nobody give a shit about your opinion.
There is conflict of interest here, so all what you are saying means nothing. You are loosing your time.
Nobody give a shit of someone opinion where there is conflict of interest.
So wait, when the Dash developers asked coinmarketcap to take the "significantly premined" tag off, was that a conflict of interest and something that should be disregarded?
Accurate evidence is accurate evidence, regardless of the source. Unless you can show the evidence to be inaccurate, conflict of evidence is a bullshit objection to evidence you don't like.
How is it a conflict to have something removed that is not accurate? Smooth, you've publicly stated you don't feel premine is equal to instamine. You acknowledge that dark/dash was never premined but yet you are perfectly ok with them assigning this incorrect status. Why?
When I asked you yesterday about the evidence you provided for a "premine", you said there was none. You provided evidence of a instamine cloaked as a premine. If the two are not the same why do you keep playing word games??
You are playing word games in an attempt to push your agenda. This self fulfilling righteous witch hunt to rid crypto of scams and protect investors means nothing when you yourself cannot be honest in your intent. The fact you continue to play these charades further proves you have no honest intent and you are not objective. These actions are what turns your so called honest concerns into pure trolling. Your only goal is to continue to bash dash in a feeble attempt to make monero some how look better.
I can think of several other coins, monero not one of those, right now that could and should be on your list but you only have your sights set on one. If you were truly objective and worried about the safety of investors, why ignore the other coins with issues too?