YOU accused them of dangerous temperatures upwards of 100C based on photos that you didn't even realize was flimsy plastic. As coinits points out, there may even be a bug at fault that neither you nor asicspace knew about that would have Bitmain share the blame here.
I have friggin S5 here at my place, so again: Do not jump to conclusions if you want to appear as someone applying rational thinking. Because you are not, you are assuming again.
Since you clearly don't know how to evaluate the damage or the responsible party, your accusations are really just going to make you look like an angry asshole instead of a poor mistreated customer.
Again: assumptions. You neither know my background nor anything else, yet you seem to know it all.
For all I know, you have no idea at all about anything.
And besides that, you are wrong: A hoster is responsible for the hosted equipment, hence ASICSPACE should have taken action once they recognized the damage. The truth is, ASICCRAP was at no point in time aware of the damage, as they simply had not taken a single look at the machines but rather said something about network issues, slight heat problems etc.
If this was not about hiding, then it was about incompetence. And what knowledge do we have about systematic S5 failures? Right, none. Bitmain has a faultrate, which is by far below 1% They disclosed this and much more when working on the systematic evaluation of the situation and are doing so right now in Denver.
Does this look like "slight heat problems" to you, if 50% of the boards look like this?
Ah, you do not need to answer, it does not contribute in any way to the solution of the problem.