Thankful-for-Today releasing an unoptimized miner is Subjective, there's a chance it may have been incompetance since it was forked code from Bytecoin(therefore all the things from Bytecoin including the unoptimized miner was transferred on). Since no direct changes were made to the coin's parameters that resulted in any obvious benefit to miners, then it isn't objective. Not to mention all the mining done there was considered negated since the big miners sold all their coins as shown by the link you've posted yourself. You seem extremely clueless on what actually happened in the beginning's of both coins, mr coins101.
Dash's instamine is objective, it's actual features were changed for no reason(especially the max coin supply) and the only explanation is that it was intended to further enrich the early instaminers.
If you haven't read this, go ahead. I hope you enjoy 11% of your coin supply being owned by one of those instaminers as well.
I am clueless thereofore I continue to troll
So you continue to resort to blatant trolling, also while Thankful-for-today releasing an unoptimized miner is a bad thing, it's not fraud. If you wish to get technical, the code was forked from Bytecoin and the subsequent miner was as well. The fork was performed by Thankful-for-today, who was kicked out of any leadership positions by now the 7 person Monero dev team. Having an unoptimized miner is immoral, but not fraudelent as though the probability is more likely that it was released on purpose, there is still a small chance it was Thankful-for-Today's incompetance that resulted in it as well. Then to get in even further, the effects of the Thankful-for-Today character releasing that miner was negatated, or proved worthless, as the biggest miners at the time sold all the coins that they mined.
There you have it, there is absolutely nothing that can be said against Monero's past withstanding at this moment. The early coins were all sold off as shown in that link you posted and the many many OTC trades and exchange trades.
Unlike Dash, where one of the original instaminers still own 11% of the entire coin supply as shown here: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dash/wallet.dws?559582.htm . Your beloved Dash is a scam, I know it's hard to accept the truth. But you trolling and trying to downplay it isn't doing you any justice, it's just giving me the motive to continue digging deeper for more incriminating evidence in the Dash instamine scam.
So far as I've told you a 'million times'. Evan Duffield released Dash with Linux only miners, mined over 2million Dash with a few others, sliced and diced the block reward many times over, then released an obscure(Highly likely sockpuppet infested) poll, where they then proceeded to cut the max coin supply from 80million to 20million. And again, for a period of time, Evan Duffield was the only person able to mine Dash as the public miner wasnt working.
Comparing Monero and Dash is like comparing apples and oranges again. The math behind Dash(Block Reward and max coin supply) were manually changed by it's developer, Evan Duffield, resulting in an enormous benefit to instaminers/developer himself. That cannot be compared to Monero's unoptimized miner, which had no effect at all on Monero's core features and no obvious attempt to enrich early miners. In court TFT would probably be able to play the incompetance card, as he did no change to Monero's core features that would have resulted in an obvious attempt to enrich early miners, which is exactly what Evan Duffield did to Dash.
Dash is a scam, it is irrefutable. As I said before, if/when crypto becomes regulated currencies like Dash will be the absolute first to be investigated for extreme fraudelent actiivity, Good Luck.EDIT: There's even more to the Dash instamine story, it seems Evan Duffield actually released Dash before it's intended release date, so Dash's instamine could be compared to a premine. Wow, this scam just keeps getting juicer.