Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: GAW / Josh Garza discussion. Paycoin XPY CoinStand Mineral. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)
by
miaviator
on 02/05/2015, 17:19:54 UTC
Quote from: Multicoin on May 02, 2015, 04:29:55 PM
Quote from: miaviator on May 02, 2015, 04:14:30 PM
Quote from: Multicoin on May 02, 2015, 04:12:38 PM
Quote from: bitpop on May 02, 2015, 12:32:45 PM
Only an idiot like Homero moves a domain, ddos affects the ip only

Now owned by

Crypto Private Investor Group
34 E Dudley Town Rd
Bloomfield, CT 06002
Pretty damn sure I unsubscribed from any lists that GAW had me on, and based on their privacy policy, they wouldn't share info with other parties (companies in this case.)

I'm not in the loop per-se, but if GAW changed their name to this crypto private investor group, then they still managed to cock it up and send me unsolicited spam.
If however this company is a different entity, then they have shared 'personal details' and broken their privacy policy.

Are there laws against that in your jurisdiction?

Who is the reporting agency for that?

Do you have proof IE an unsubscribe notice and old TOS/Privacy policy which shows the violation?

Or is this just FUD Smiley
I actually specifically asked to be removed from all databases my hashtalk account was in, in addition to unsubscribing using the links they put in the bottom of their notification emails, unsub'ing from the news emails they did ages ago, and any other emails from GAW. Not that I haven't done business with GAW for over 6 months, it can be classified as unsolicited email

None of this stuff needs FUD anymore; GAW makes their own FUD ffs.

Multicoin

You should check your local jurisdiction:

http://www.ncsl.org/research/telecommunications-and-information-technology/state-spam-laws.aspx

http://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_925.htm#sec_52-570c

Quote
(d) Any person aggrieved by a violation of the provisions of this section may bring a civil action in the Superior Court to enjoin further violations and for five hundred dollars for each violation, together with costs and a reasonable attorney’s fee. No such action shall be brought but within two years from the date of the act complained of. For purposes of this subsection, each electronic mail sent in violation of subsection (b) of this section constitutes a separate and distinct violation.