The photo is very nice practical design which is superior to the Moby, IMO.
Notice the sloped rear design of Moby will make it very difficult to have bathroom, bedroom or quality standing room.
Unless of course Moby is a Tardis.
Moby looks cool on first glance but think about how much you can fit in that triangle design and how difficult it will be to walk around give the large deck space at the open end. Something is going to have to be radically changed for it to be practical.
The Waternest looks a better design, IMO.
Notice the sloped rear design of Moby will make it very difficult to have bathroom, bedroom or quality standing room.
Unless of course Moby is a Tardis.
Moby looks cool on first glance but think about how much you can fit in that triangle design and how difficult it will be to walk around give the large deck space at the open end. Something is going to have to be radically changed for it to be practical.
The Waternest looks a better design, IMO.
What you're seeing is a render of Moby. Architects and engineers always argue on practicality and design. Don't jump into the conclusion that it wouldn't work, successful designers have made the seemingly impossible. For you IT guys, it's a battle between web designers and developers, as designers demand site aesthetics and functionality that are also seemingly impossible, but in the end, the final product worked out beautifully.
Similar design by successful architects with many projects: source http://t.co/X6UMVjNh6g
the moby looks to also have a flat hull, which gets very bumpy with some chop on the water, so don't leave your expensive champagne glasses unattended over a 5 kt breeze.
Don't assume the chief architect has no nautical engineers working on this project. One day when you'll be able to see a finished Moby floating on a body of water, the price of Arch will be much higher than now.