There is no way to use "placebo" as an explanation with plants.
One could, subconsciously, be providing better care to them.
Ah, but one could easily design an experiment to eliminate this bias. The truly skeptical should do just that!
Furthermore, one's own experience cannot be reduced to neural signals; consciousness is irreducible
: a theory holding that the self can know nothing but its own modifications and that the self is the only existent thing; also : extreme egocentrism
In other words, such a network is unable to distinguish between a veridical perception and an hallucination. Doing so would require the existence of another, independent network, whose task it is to learn to associate specific input patterns with specific patterns of activity of the first networks hidden units. That system would then be able to identify cases where the latter exists in the absence of the former, and hence, to learn to distinguish between cases of veridical perception and cases of hallucination. Such internal monitoring is viewed here as constitutive of conscious experience: A mental state is a conscious mental state when the system that possesses this mental state is (at least non-conceptually) sensitive to its existence. Thus, and unlike what is assumed to be case in HOT Theory, meta-representations can be both subpersonal and non-conceptual.
This fits with what I and Hatonn and Chopra have been saying about finding god within you and about metabiological evolution; a shift in the consciousness of consciousness.
For your reference, Deepak Chopra's The Way of the Wizard:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyMfuTzSDLw