Stop being subjective, use only what's known, please and thank you. What's known is what turtle83 has recorded, saying anything otherwise like you have been, is stupid and illogical.
What is stupid and illogical is thinking a snapshot of nodes one client was seeing at a certain time is the total list of the nodes that were mining before and after the fact.
Someone owning 11% of all Dash coins, coupled with Dash having 35% of it's current coin supply stem from a 2 day instamine, is Horrible Distribution. Get real.
And how do you know how many people mined those 35%, and how many of them kept them all?
Ok let's recap what happened.
Evan released Dash before it's intended release date. He also released it so it could only be mined on Linux. By those two factors, we can assume that not as many people mined Dash as they would have mined a coin that was released on time and available to mine on Windows, Mac, and Linux.
The only nodes we know of are the ones turtle83 noted, saying otherwise is foolish. There are no other soures to compare Turtle83's list of nodes to, therefore making any argument of "what if" irrelevant. Stop being subjective, thank you..
You are stating it has horrible distribution as a fact. I just hoped you could somehow show that instead of assuming things the way that they conform with your agenda. I guess not then.
You can't make any other conclusion from the node list than at least those nodes were online at some point before turtle83 posted the list. Nothing else. Stop being stupid, thank you..