Stop being subjective, use only what's known, please and thank you. What's known is what turtle83 has recorded, saying anything otherwise like you have been, is stupid and illogical.
What is stupid and illogical is thinking a snapshot of nodes one client was seeing at a certain time is the total list of the nodes that were mining before and after the fact.
Someone owning 11% of all Dash coins, coupled with Dash having 35% of it's current coin supply stem from a 2 day instamine, is Horrible Distribution. Get real.
And how do you know how many people mined those 35%, and how many of them kept them all?
Ok let's recap what happened.
Evan released Dash before it's intended release date. He also released it so it could only be mined on Linux(Take note that 90%+ of all computers use Windows as the operating system). By those two factors, we can assume that not as many people mined Dash as they would have mined a coin that was released on time and available to mine on Windows, Mac, and Linux. Proof of this is in the Dash thread, where the first pages are riddled with users complaning and being unable to mine.
The only nodes we know of are the ones turtle83 noted, saying otherwise is foolish. There are no other soures to compare Turtle83's list of nodes to, therefore making any argument of "what if" irrelevant. Stop being subjective, thank you..
Your Linux argument is void, anyone can use it so end of story.
With a name like ProsperityForAll it sounds like an oxymoron to me with the stance your taking...