..............
I can't stress enough that all these numbers are based on actual real-life performance, they are not wild-eyed estimates of possible future growth figures, etc. I think it will be hard to continue to argue that this asset is priced unreasonably.
As you all know:
"Past performance is not an indication of future performance" Do not forget to update this thread when you have to cough up a fat payment and PE jumps at the other direction.
True enough... though the statistical profits should actually be higher than the actual profit thus far. So the site has made -less- than the statistical odds would suggest. Running the site longer should move the real return higher, not lower. With flat performance, the numbers will improve, not worsen.
Are you trying to shoot some of your circle-jerk cum in to your "investors" collective eyeball?
This whole IPO has become a fkn joke. Why? You and your sock puppets got way to greedy.