There's a difference between being skeptical and calling someone a scammer.
Yes. In this case the difference was the same as between having no brain and having one.
Or, in some cases it was the difference between profiting from the scam and being honest.
Most of the FUDsters were claiming 100% irrefutable proof, when none existed.
This is the typical garbage to be expected from you. Outside of mathematics there is rarely any "100% irrefutable proof", yet nobody (except you and a few others) would ask for it when sombody calls a duck a duck.
I think it is high time for you to shut up and stop being part of the huge fraud most of us tried hard to protect people from.