In this way, I can force the economic change now and start to kill the banksters' paradigm.
If you are publicly sharing your plot against the "banksters" (TPTB_need_war ), doesn't the reality of your still being alive to do so necessarily imply that your efforts will not compromise their efforts (to any significant degree)?
If ever my social network attains sufficient popularity for the banksters to notice, there will be dozens of others vying to copy my idea and the banksters will thus be fighting a virus they can't defeat.
Ditto my strategy for crypto-currency. But it is more helpful to be anonymous in that case, because I actually want the money involved (coins owned) to be anonymous. In the case of the social network, I want the profit earned to be publicly declarable.
The concept of trying to "winner take all" is the antithesis of success and prosperity. All those fools who thought Bitcoin would "winner take all" conquer the world. Analogous to dogs chasing their tails, they wish for the poison that enables what they think they are trying to defeat.
I explained this in the Skycoin thread.