Bump . Quickseller care to reply in the thread ever ?
No. I have addressed your concerns about you not being an alt of tacoman71, although I do find it extremely suspicious that Ume just so happens to PM me within ~24 hours of you PM'ing me to have your negative trust removed and just so happens to post in this thread very shortly after you created this thread.
I have updated my negative trust to reflect that you created the scam accusation in order to buy the account for a lower then market price, effectively scamming the owner of the account of money that he reasonably could have received from a sale of the account under reasonable circumstances.
Do you have any evidence to support those claims or is this just speculation? This sounds like a story one could make up from assumptions.
Have you considered looking at the revised trust rating that I left him? I am no forensics expert, however it looks like pretty convincing proof to me
Your addresses are not those of an exchange. I sent you a list of addresses that are likely part of the wallet file none of which are associated with an exchange; Blazr did a much more in-depbth analysis of each of the addresses giving additional evidence that they are not exchange addresses.
Furthermore, you opened up a
scam accusation against Ume at most two hours prior to contacting him to
buy the account. This means one of two things, one - you faked the sale in order to attempt to protect the trust rating of your account, or more likely, two - opened the scam accusation in order to put pressure on Ume to sell any account he had in his possession cheaply, which according to your screenshots you were able to do. Regardless it is more then appropriate to let the negative trust remain on the account. (Delete)]/quote]
Here we go again. So from what you are saying it seems you are implying that I faked the sale. But here is the thing that will clarify your ignorance of the fact. You neg repped me due to the loan address Twipple requested the loan to. If I had to fake it, why would I be stupid enough to use some address related with the scammer ?
And I opened the scam accusation against Ume, because I thought he edited out the loan message, and I saw his own alts giving him trust, which I also reported. What exactly are you saying ? Ume was a FM then, so I am stupid to use a Member account, to trap my own FM account ?
Why is it appropriate to leave the trust , If I am not a scammer ?
And Why did you remove trust from Pagalwana, who had the same case as me, but just because you escrowed it, you removed it. Should I give you your 10 cents for the escrow ? ANd WIll you remove it then ?
Here's the deal: it's absolutely pointless to argue with him. I've yet to see one example of a case where arguing the facts with quickseller led to him backing down. It's his personality, he doesn't back down. Once you've openly crossed him in public you are not going to get any respect from him unless he sees you as more powerful than him. Those are literally the only people he shows any kind of humanity or deference towards. Anyone else is SOL. This is going to continue until the people above him recognize that allowing this guy to take a scorched earth policy with people who disagree with him is problematic. However, because QS remains deferent to those above him, they don't actually experience the bullying, quicktempered, impossibly-arrogant side of him that the rest of us have to deal with. Look at my case, he went after me with two different accounts leaving three negative feedbacks and we've literally never even traded or interacted beyond the fact that I called him out for his hot temper and had the audacity to argue with him in public. He didn't need any evidence to do this to me, why would he need evidence for anything else he does? This will last until someone above him corrects the situation by removing him from their trust list(s).
