My opinion:
I'm looking at unibtc.4real signature address 1Uni1bGoEeDfdW2skwv2JihHrnrJe5RQf
All sent transactions here
https://blockchain.info/address/1Uni1bGoEeDfdW2skwv2JihHrnrJe5RQf?offset=0&filter=1Mostly are .0002 fee, sometimes .0004 fee when many inputs. So perhaps an older version of electrum which uses a .0002 btc/1kb default fee.
It is very inconsistent and shady to have such a low fee 0.000001 when you never customized your fee before.
You also can't reason out the location since i do use vpns to log and play on different sites.
Interesting that you prepared a defense for this already when nothing was mentioned about about location.
I really hope this will get fixed soon.. And like you said from your previous replies, i think its good to require 1 confirmation for deposits like other casinos do.
This is inconsistent on how you felt before:
The features I'd like to see OR improved are the following:
1. Deposit balance needs 1 confirmation. These days, 1 confirmation sometimes takes ages for bitcoin network to confirm. I'd like to see an instant credit even with 0 confirmation. Alot of gambling sites do this with no issues.
give back my deposit of 10btc since i never lost that at all and we can part ways
Agree with dooglus here, no legitimate honest customer would be fine in parting ways if they were indeed scammed. Only a double spender would be happy to get back the deposit.
I'm not going to argue about topics that are irrelevant to the issue, that address has not been used for some time now.. But the real issue here is the admin has no hard facts that connects my account to the accounts that attacked his site.. Similarities are not proof of any crime or misconduct.. I have explained my side of the story and I stand my ground that my account and/or me did not commit the said double spent attack.