Re: signatuer payouts

that list should be upgraded, in the way that it list the it list the most profitable campaign in the first spost then the second ecc..., and not how it is right now, it would be easy for everyone to join the best one

and divided for newbie and other members, for example dadice and bit-x should stay in the first 1-2 spots for full members+ and for fullmembers- 777coin should be the first then the others

There is no way to do that as what is 'best' or most profitable depends on the individual's posting habits and rank. Rates are constantly changing and sometimes people even get better deals than stated in the op if they're a quality poster etc.

I think Amph is trying to say that instead of a single list that is given at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0; the list can be categorized in to ones good for newbies, jr. members, full members and so on and on...
-snip-

But what is good for you might not be good for me.

True... The benefits from signature campaigns do indeed depend on the posts that the participating user makes; whether they be constructive or not and hence one campaign may be better for someone and another campaign may be better for another member... It becomes the duty of participating member to carefully analyze campaigns
besides I just wrote what Amph intended in his post so... All is Well