This time you are getting clearly personal, which is absolutely unexpected from someone in DefaultTrust. You can not deny the fact that OP contacted you first and when he did not get any response from you and found that you are still posting in the forum, then only he created this thread and contacted your DefaultTrust sponsors. How come you claim that someone will be -ve trusted because of some personal policy you'll create at some point of time ?
Nothing personal about it - although your post seems personal against me.
The OP does not clearly state to a reasonable person that you can lose all your coins. It says your investment will expire after 120 hours, but what does that mean? I'm glad you feel that is "good enough" but I'd like to see more - especially since he promotes his ponzi as Transparent and Secure (lol).
I'm working on a policy to apply to all ponzis but until I decide on a clear definition, I still want to protect this community and his ponzi is a scam. He recently upped his minimum bet by a factor of 10. He's also a newer account with no vested interest. He could easily disappear with the coins, re-register a new domain and start all over. With his minimum bet increase, he'll now do it 10x earlier.
Why ? Otherwise wont that be a partial judgement ? Should DefaultTrust judgement be served like this way ?
In a perfect world, all ponzis will be treated to the same scrutiny. I'm working towards that perfect world, and I hope you will give me time.
