Re: Quickseller, trust abuse, innacurate negative ratings, unprofesional escrow...

@Vod, okay thanks for the humor. What about an opinion on this situation with worhiper_-_?

Having only glanced at it quickly, it looks like worhiper_-_ backed out of a deal - nothing wrong with that.

If someone was scammed out of coins, a negative trust is warranted, and should be backed with a reference.

If no one lost anything and a deal went sour in due diligence (or whenever), everyone should just walk away. In this case, a neutral would be more appropriate, warning others not to waste their time.

He agreed to a deal with a seller and once escrow was setup he backed out of the deal. This is a sign that he was trying to avoid using escrow and only agreed to accept escrow to avoid setting off any red flags to others. Despite this being a bad idea, often times people will simply agree to trade without escrow if one does not respond and setup escrow quickly enough.

@QS you were so keen to have me remove that BS feedback that alt account left you, yet you go around red-inking everybody like it doesn't mean anything. Listen you: that magic wand of yours, use with caution.

that negative that you removed from KoS was 100% BS. There is actual substance behind the negative I left the OP.

Have I misunderstood the point of escrow??

the point of escrow is to ensure that all parties are protected in a transaction. As well to ensure that the transaction proceeds as agreed. The OP had agreed that a certain amount of money would be sent to the seller via myself and the OP deprived the seller his money that he was due.