Don't forget insincere. Everything it says is not intended for any face value, always
Incorrect.
for some confabulated, tortured effect. Highly intelligent, but applied entirely to social engineering from several perspectives at once (i.e. how the entire discourse is perceived by all actors at all levels of psychological investment in said discourse).
Correct.
Edit#1: Tortured for those readers who do not like the message. Socially engineered (and on multiple levels of perspective) because marketing is. I am interested in accomplishing a goal with a sincere outcome. It is not possible to make everyone happy all the time.
Is the ideology pitched by the Bitcoin folks here not confabulated (sufficiently misaligned with the facts) in some respects? It is not torture for those of us who see it failing the fundamental tenets? Did some of you not try to use social engineering and peer pressure to squelch our voices?
Edit#2: what is interesting is how some Bitcoin supporters view discussions about anything that is not an improvement to Bitcoin as treason or noise. I think they reason that if Bitcoin fails, our only chance fails. Because surely they could sell BTC and buy the superior coin and profit. So it must be some ideological reason they are so defensive. Perhaps it is the "safety in herds" and "fight or flight" underdeveloped prefrontal cortex instinct left over from
primitive, post-paleozoic, hunter-gatherer epoch.