Post
Topic
Board Investor-based games
Re: [May 19th, 2015] Ponzis Explained w/ Analysis & Ratings
by
Gantz
on 19/05/2015, 16:21:50 UTC
Added Ratings:



MMMGlobal.org
http://i.imgur.com/tgB8lzw.jpg
Transparency: http://i.imgur.com/L0LMqxa.png /10
Potential Longevity: LONG
Concept: http://i.imgur.com/L0LMqxa.png /10
Plan: 120-200% Monthly
Risk: HIGH
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -                
Gantz Rating: 1/10

 Considerations:
 Hybrid chain letter/ponzi, not trasparent system and primarily no stats at all. This makes really hard understand in which status is the system, and their very slow earning system should discourage to join.



Dr-Bitcoin.com
http://i.imgur.com/zaUO6ju.jpg
Transparency: 0 /10
Potential Longevity: MEDIUM
Concept: http://i.imgur.com/L0LMqxa.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/L0LMqxa.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/L0LMqxa.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/L0LMqxa.png /10
Plan: 2,6-3,6% Daily
Risk: HIGH
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -                
Gantz Rating: 3/10

 Considerations:
 They want big fishes, see their plans. In fact I considered only the dailys, other plans are just insanely high. Not transparent, can be easily manipulated. Potential longevity is compromised due to possibility to run away after that some big fish join. Their effort in the project can be considered a good thing.

 Updates:
 19/5/15 Potential Longevity from SHORT to MEDIUM
 19/5/15 Concept from http://i.imgur.com/L0LMqxa.png to http://i.imgur.com/L0LMqxa.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/L0LMqxa.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/L0LMqxa.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/L0LMqxa.png
 19/5/15 Gantz Rating from 1 to 3
 Reason: After a little discussion in this thread I agreed that their effort into the project can be considered a good thing. Also a signal that they don't go away so quckly.