I'm going to try to explain this like you're five. I don't don't if it will work. You might not be quite at that mental level yet.
Show the bitcoin blockchain to the Average Joe, and he doesn't see a damn thing, just a bunch of letters and numbers. Better yet, show the actual bytes, not how it is interpreted on a block explorer. Understanding, interpreting, and verifying that blockchain requires an understanding of the protocol, and being able to do things like verify secp256k1 signatures and sha256 hashes (two bits of complex cryptographic math) in order to tell that the blocks are valid, the transactions are valid, and the outputs (coins) you receive are legitimate.
Monero is exactly the same damn thing. If you understand the protocol, and how to verify CryptoNight hashes and CryptoNote ring signatures (two more bits of complex cryptographic math) you can tell the blocks are valid, the transactions are valid, and the outputs (coins) you receive are legitimate.
It is a different protocol, with different cryptographic math, but from the point of view of verifying the chain, exactly the same.
You also don't know what fungibility even means as a definition. It means interchangeable. If the coins are all mathematically verifiable (and they are), and can't be attached to some unique and distinctive history (which the can't), then it is fungible. Whatever other gibberish you want to throw around in an ongoing months- (years- ?) long display of your own ignorance does not mean fungible, if it means anything at all.
Smooth I think it's quite disgraceful that you as a core-dev are here on a thread asking for your own special forum section on BCT, and are then replying to people who disagree with you insulting their mental level and saying it's that of a five year old, that really shows you aren't capable of defending your position or behaving with any kind of decorum that we would expect from a core-dev of a coin that BCT needs to create a separate section for.
Opaque blockchain with everything hidden sounds pretty dumb to a lot of people and just insulting them doesn't make your argument correct.
For a start you have no idea what the distribution is (unless of course you are Busoni at Poloniex or FluffyPony with MyMonero.com) or how funds are being moved around.....and given you have whales on Poloniex throwing around chunks of 50k XMR like they are candy I think actually you might have a problem in this area, and in fact doesn't opaque blockchain attract people who want to take of advantage of hidden distribution for manipulation purposes?
Second if there is any backdooring in the cryptography or more likely implementation of same that is found, then the whole thing falls apart (which I am guessing if there was, you wouldn't find it, because Bytecoin/Cryptonote developed the cryptography, not you, and you didn't have the competence to find the scam miner code you launched according to yourself).
Third, anonymity in Monero has the caveat that it can be reversed at any time in the future with a viewkey (instant deanonimization.......). So if the police seize your PC and order you to hand over your viewkey which in most countries you have to, or extortionists / border agents / tax officials or whoever, voila they can deanonimize that account. Unlike mixing techs which create ambiguity that's irreversible so you can't just deanonimize someone with a key - that 'feature' in a coin claiming to be 'untraceable' like Monero seems like a pretty dumb idea to me....