Plus they are having a scammer represent them and paying a scammer to advertise for them. This only strengthens concerns that DaDice is in fact a scam. Why else would they hire a scammer to advertise for them if they were not planning on scamming themselves?
Sorry mate, if you don't mind can you shed some light on what this is all about - since I have no idea what you are talking about.
Thanks!
Scammer's profile link -
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=138744They are being allowed to participate in your signature campaign even though he received negative trust and is a scammer.
Refrence thread1 shows where the scammer had scammed.
Refrence post1 shows how it is impossible for the scammer to make the conclusion that he did not in fact scam.
Refrence thread2 is where the scammer attempted to bully me into removing the negative rating. Additionally he has been trolling me for well over a month now because of the negative rating that I left him.
As long as he is a paid representative/advertiser of your site I would personally consider your site to be untrustworthy.
We have already investigated into it. And I don't really think he should be removed from the campaign because of that singular issue you have mentioned.
The trust is not valid as per the current rules. And I don't think I am not the only one (nor dadice or other representatives/moderators of Da Dice) that say he shouldn't be allowed to participate in the campaign.
Dunno what that has to do with you trusting the site

Anyway, lol, not feeling like arguing here..

Edit: I get the impression that you are taking your personal opinion to such extent
