Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: DaDice.com - Next Generation Social Gambling Dice Experience
by
Quickseller
on 20/05/2015, 17:46:49 UTC
Quote from: dadice on May 20, 2015, 04:39:44 PM
Quote from: NLNico on May 20, 2015, 04:30:11 PM
Quote from: Quickseller on May 20, 2015, 02:13:31 PM
Quote from: shitaifan2013 on May 20, 2015, 01:58:31 PM
Quote from: Quickseller on May 20, 2015, 01:27:53 PM
list of addresses that are known to belong to dadice

address that has a high probability of belonging to DaDice.

After a quick look at the transaction histories, there are no other obvious wallets and/or addresses that belong to DaDice.

Neither of the above have ever had a significant balance
It should also be noted that DaDice chooses to be affiliated with a known scammer and chooses to use a known scammer to advertise for them. Based on this I would certainly question their ethics.


the second link (1HmA...) is their hot wallet.

you also missed this adress I think https://blockchain.info/nl/address/1PmDaczwNg2QUyj5j8kFHNP53H44LR74nS

should be one of those single investor cold storages.
I looked at the address published on their signature campaign thread (the one controlled by devthedev) and it looks like it is funded by this address which has inputs from this address, this shows nothing however that address has inputs from this address which spent funds to both the previous address and an address linked to blackbankmarket which is a dark market site. It could be a consequence however if you go back two more transactions then you find this address which also sent funds to blackbankmarket. Going back further, there are addresses that sent funds to bitcoin fog multiple times, and it eventually traces back to localbiitcoins. Looking at the other address that sent funds to the address that funds the escrow address, only a few hops go back to LBC.

This makes me conclude one of two things, one that DaDice is potentially associated with blackbankmarket or two that they are going to great lengths to hide their source of funds.

Edit: how do you know that belongs to DaDice?
Interesting. Yeh the sig escrow addy is https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/8379764fd173ff82 and this has been funded by (must be all in control of DaDice!):

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/530ca0f7083ee47f
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/DaDice.com
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/186737e657cfc1c7
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/e341c2059ee65039
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/6a37977cce57e5f0

In theory that wallet e341c2059ee65039 can be a deposit address of DaDice though (so player deposited 10 coins and they used it to fill signature campaign funds.) It is definitely clear that the player funds go directly to the sig escrow at least. This can be okay if they had this 540 coin cold wallet, but now it is obviously concerning since we do not know if they are solvent. Actually it looks like they have only a 2 figure bitcoin amount - all connected addresses get relatively small amounts and deposits are going straight to signature campaign and withdrawals. No wonder they don't want to show a cold wallet.

The first filling of sig coins was obviously not yet from players since site was brand new. The first 8 coins were from: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/25310a847341f5b1 (first 8 coin in 530ca0f7083ee47f) One of the sources is "EvolutionMarket" and some other like Bitstamp.net, Bit-x.com, LB. It's pretty interesting to withdraw from several sites (including a dark market) if you got 500 coins, just to scrape that 8 coins together, but okay.

1PmDaczwNg2QUyj5j8kFHNP53H44LR74nS is indeed part of DaDice wallet and cold wallet of that user. But walletexplorer is ~11 blocks behind so didn't update this yet.


Cool site that walletexplorer.com Smiley

Well, actually the sig campaign address was never funded from any our receiving wallets. You don't even have a clue on which address we will receive the next deposit...  But continue with your nonsense, I have popcorn ready to read your interesting comments.
If you don't want people to go around looking for your addresses like this then you should be transparent about your cold storage addresses. It makes little sense to have separate addresses for each investor because an investor could devest only a portion of their investment which would mean you would need to access cold storage for even a small withdrawal which makes no sense.

It also should not be difficult to find your cold storage addresses as someone would simply need to make a ~5 BTC deposit then simply watch and see where the funds end up.