Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?
by
Pentax
on 27/05/2015, 14:55:20 UTC
anyone that votes for her simply because she is a women is a idiot.

That should go without saying but sadly there'll be so many female tools that will pull the lever for her if she runs that it will be sickening. This is why we Rand as the GOP nominee to provide a plethora of substance to at least put the issues of freedom and the status of this country out there for everyone to consider.

Many male tools also.  I know the left fairly well.

Another person who knows the left is Glen Greenwald.  I got a kick out of his prediction that after Hillary the Liberals will probably run a faggot.  This is particularly amusing since Greenwald himself is a homosexual.  Needless to say this prediction got under the skin of a lot of Liberals and caused significant discomfort.

Great quip by Glen.  I love it when he makes Rachel Madcow and her fellow travelers have a big sad.   Grin

Many on the honorable-but-misled left are (now) (also) sick and tired of their radical Marxist/feminist wings' unrelenting identity politics.

The backlash began when even Good Progressives couldn't criticize Obama for his Dubya-like warmongering without being called racist.

It intensified when even Good Progressives couldn't criticize Hilldog for her Dubya-like warmongering without being called sexist.

Few things anger people more than having their sincere informed individual opinions pre-judged, invalidated, and brushed off as mere 'Mansplaining' and/or 'Whitesplaining.'


Yes. Progressives have been replaced by borgs. Accepting anything, as long as the dude doing it has a D next the name. Critical thinking for them is an unknown construct now.


 

Yep, it's the race card, or the gender card, or the rich card, or the old angry white man card, whatever it takes to brush an opposing viewpoint aside without actually answering to it.  Their minions suck it up like manna, and then spew it wherever they can.

Logical fallacy run amok.

It's not as if both/all parties don't do it, although I'll agree that the Dems have it down to an art form.  My personal theory is that it is because their party is cobbled together largely by special interest groups, all of which think they're victims of one sort or another, so this speaks to what they themselves truly believe in the first place, which is that "it" is always someone else's fault and "they" do what they do out of some prejudice or desire "to keep us down". 

That is not to say there aren't smart Dems also with which we simply have differing viewpoints.  It's more about the larger populace that both sides do their best to manipulate with these sorts of labeling schemes.  It's easy and it works, largely because of the 'stupidity of the American voter' as pointed out by that asshole Gruber.