..and the badlist author is scrypt user, but anyway, it mean something, dont you think?
Ooh, are you suggesting that badbitcoin.org and Homero Joshua Garza might actually be behind scrypt.cc itself?
I'd fucking wet myself laughing if it turned out to be true. Given the epic saga that has been the GAW/XPY ponzi/matrix scam it would be simply delicious to connect the dots from them to scrypt.cc
sry I didnt meant it like you understand, my english is bad probably. But absolutely wrong, this is what you want to mean. I meant, if scrypt.cc is scam, it would be on badlist, and author of badlist will not use scrypt.cc. Im happy scrypt user, fan, roi broken 2times - even with this electricity thing, now playing just with earnings. I bought a lot on panic sell for low, now checking everyday price rising, probably will rise til 1.june, we will se then. Im naive? Ok, we will see, right? Scrypt is scam? Maybe yes, but very funny scam.
Ah, seems you have the wrong conclusion then. Badbitcoin.org has been proven to be directly involved in supporting an existing fraudulent operation with GAW/XPY and, so, if they are also promoting scrypt.cc all the while the same reasoning which has them asserting other 'cloud mining' operations to be fraudulent also applies to scrypt.cc, then the only possible conclusion is that badbitcoin is also colluding with scrypt.cc.
BTW, @SpanishSoldier, the whole point of how a Ponzi scheme ensures they keep the scam rolling so long is by letting people withdraw when they want to 'test' whether they can, because then they generally will send it straight back in to 'compound' their 'profit'. That's how it works, because everybody is satisfied that, if they wanted to, they could withdraw their funds but in the meantime they will keep 're-investing' their 'profit'.
Ponzi schemes only ever have to pay out a small fraction of the total amount that is sent to them as 'investments', as long as new suckers are brought into the scheme through . . .you guessed it, referrals.
Eventually it can't possibly keep up the needed flow of new 'investors' and the outflow threatens to increase to a larger percentage relative to the new money coming in, which ultimately results in . . . lights out.
Qua qua qua... U sound like Charlie Browns friggin teacher (thanks to ford fair lane for that one!)
Seriously, do you ever quit spouting the same old bullshit?
Let's fast forward a year from now, scryptcc are still paying out happily, they even post some pictures of their mining farm. Then what? 2 more years, u still gonna be spinning the same bullshit?
If script cc shut down their site and take our money, please laugh in my face all you want. Until then, please be fucking off because I think I speak on behalf of the majority on this thread, no one gives a shit what you have to say.
+1 if u agree me ppl, I can't be the only 1 sick of this bullshit.
In the meantime, I'll keep pocketing my 0.1btc daily, thanks scryptcc for the steady income. I wish I was at the same level Dice was on tho!
I for one, take the information found on badbitcoin.org with a grain of salt. I made that decision based on my own findings, not necessarily from reading other people's opinion.
That said, I continue to "mine" on scrypt.cc - but I have my ROI and prefer to sit back and see what unfolds with the remainder of the KHS I have on the site. No more deposits.
I guess I'm one of those who hasn't really lost... and isn't really getting rich.